6,900,000 pageviews


Monday, May 20, 2024

The Michael Barbar Murder Case

      In 2009 51-year-old Michael Barbar, a native of Lebanon, lived with his wife Maysam and their two daughters, ages 10 and 6, in a two-story house in Perris, a Riverside County town of 70,000 in southern California. Michael had a 19-year-old daughter from a former marriage who didn't live with him and Maysam.

     In mid-August 2009 Michael learned that his 43-year-old wife, at the time attending cosmetology school, had not been faithful to him. According to information that had come to his attention, Maysam, over the past six months, had been with three other men. He also learned that the 6-year-old Tamara, the child he had helped raise from birth, had been conceived as a result of Maysam's affair with a man in 2000.

     Some time after receiving this disturbing information Michael Barbar checked Tamara out of school early one day and took her to a McDonald's where he swabbed the inside of her mouth for a DNA sample. On November 6, 2009 the paternity test revealed that she was not his child.

     On the night of November 13, 2009, after handcuffing his wife behind her back during sex, Michael Barbar wrapped an electrical cord around her neck and strangled her to death. He then placed her nude body face-down on the master bedroom floor and covered it with a blanket.

     In Tamara's bedroom Mr. Barbar coiled a television cable around the girl's neck as she slept. When the 6-year-old awoke and struggled he bashed her head against a bedpost twenty times, crushing her skull. In a third bedroom, Tamara's 10-year-old sister heard Tamar's cries and the sounds of violent death. After Tamara's murder the terrified girl heard her father carrying what sounded like trash bags out of the house. The next morning Michael Barbar's surviving daughter discovered her sister's body. The door to the master bedroom was locked. She called 911.

     Following the double murder Michael Barbar drove to nearby Cabazon, California where, at the Morongo Casino, he played the slots. The next morning he drove east to Deming, New Mexico, a border town 60 miles west of Las Cruces. His plan was to enter Mexico then fly to his homeland of Lebanon. On November 15, 2009,the police in Deming interrupted his escape by taking him into custody.

     In early June 2012 Michael Barbar went on trial in a Riverside County Superior Court for the murders of Maysam and Tamara Barbar. Because he was being tried for a double, premeditated murder, the defendant, under California law, was eligible for the death penalty. Barbar's defense attorney, while he didn't deny that his client had committed the homicides, argued that the killings had not been premeditated. According to the defense version of the case, when Michael confronted Maysam with the paternity test results she had mocked him with a smirk. So enraged by the victim's smirk Mr. Barbar snapped and killed his wife and the 6-year-old who was not his daughter. As a result this was a crime of involuntary manslaughter. (Sometimes defense attorneys are paid to embarrass themselves. This was one of those cases.)

     Prosecutor John Aki offered the jury of seven women and five men a wealth of evidence that showed the defendant's preparation and planning for the killings. Mr. Barbar, in anticipation of his murders, had acquired a set of fake identification, rented a car, researched flight schedules between Mexico and Lebanon and had withdrawn $30,000 from his bank account. On July 13, 2012, after only three hours of deliberation, the jury found the 54-year-old defendant guilty of two counts of first-degree murder.

     On July 30, 2012, the penalty phase of the trial before the same jury got underway. For Michael Barbar the two possible outcomes involved life without parole and state imposed death. On August 10, 2012 the jury recommended that Judge Edward Weber sentence Michael Barbar to death. The judge imposed that sentence.

     Crime scene investigators on the morning after the murders, had found among Michael Barbar's possessions a copy of Truman Capote's nonfiction novel, In Cold Blood. In that book, the two men who murdered a Kansas farm family in 1959 were hanged. Mr. Barbar, however, would not end up dangling at the end of a rope because in California, regardless of the wishes of a jury and the law, they do not execute anyone. 

15 comments:

  1. I can`t belive they`ll just throw him in jail, this was the mothers fault. Having a kid and letting another guy belive he is the father for many years? Are you kidding me?`What kind of hellish demon does such a thing? What kind of man is able to just take that and do nothing? Reading your death wish for this man is just disturbing, have some bitch lie to you over and over first, have a kid thats not really yours and see how it feels. This guy had a family for many years just to find out it wasn`t his family. I`m surprised he didn`t snap even worse.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Are you out of your mind?
      Let's put the question of the mother aside. What about that innocent six-year-old child? Are you immoral enough to suggest that she deserved a horrific death? You need to be locked up before you hurt someone.

      Delete
    2. His child or not, that doesn't give him the right to take her life or the life of her mother. Should have taken her to court and exposed her as a cheating spouse. But what she did does not give him the excuse to murder them.

      Delete
    3. I was one of the investigating detectives in Deming. He fully confessed his crimes to me, in detail and once found guilty, he was given the death penalty.

      Delete
  2. What planet are you from? What child deserves to feel the wrath of the sins of the parents? Do this planet justice and refrain from having children.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous, you seem the perfect storm toward an abusive and dangerous partner for any woman. Death for an unfaithful wife? what would be your 'punishment' for an unfaithful husband? You remind me of a religious extremist that believes his cow is worth more than a wife.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Mr. Barbar's life fell apart the day he learned the truth about his marriage and paternity. At times like this, we fall back to our true moral underpinning. His moral truth is that he is a honor-killing, pre-meditating murderer. The evidence showed he cold-bloodedly planned this. He may have even molled over the fact of being executed for his crime, as the killers "In Cold Blood" were. I think he even knew he was cold blooded and he thought about this when he was perusing Truman Capote's book. His wife showed who she was too. She was a lying, cheating, dysfunctional woman. He doesn't get to kill her though. Poor little Tamara. God rest her precious little soul. Yeah, glad the police got him before he left the country.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Ignorance is bliss I suppose!

    When my mother got pregnant with my baby sister my mom and step father were not together, he chose to stay when he found out she was pregnant. He knew all this!
    My mother and step father were in the process of leaving each other when he decided to murder my mom and baby sister!
    His words exactly were "if he can't have her no one else will"



    ReplyDelete
  6. Sorry to hear that but your situation is entirely different from the one the blog is talking about. Paternity Fraud is not a crime and so Michael Barbar's wife likely thought she had gotten away with her crime. She even smirked at him to mock him. Her death was completely justified.

    ReplyDelete
  7. You're scary. A smirk justifies murder?

    ReplyDelete
  8. No but Paternity Fraud does justify murder.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Cheating leads to Paternity Fraud. By cheating a woman has opened a man up to the possibility of raising one or more children that are not biologically his thus potentially and unknowingly or unbeknownst to him ending his bloodline. Making all of his diligent work moot in the eyes of evolution. In an age before DNA testing I'm sure there have been plenty of men who died thinking "their children" were theirs when they really weren't. My opinion is based on clear logic not raw sexism against women.

    ReplyDelete
  10. You’re an absolute idiot

    ReplyDelete
  11. A few of these facts are bit off, I am friends of Maymar's son who is never even mentioned because he didn't live with her. How terrible it would be for him to come on here and see people in these comments saying such terrble things about his mother. Some of you should be ashamed.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Nothing I said was idiotic. Women have been killed for adultery all throughout history for very good reason as seen in this blog post.

    ReplyDelete